Mamamoo's Functioning Hanbok Outfits Spark About Other Beginning Controversy
Article: 'Mamamoo hanbok' is Chinese traditional clothing? 'Makjang' Cathay distorting history
Source: No Cut News via Naver
1. [+203, -17] Their hanbok is designed inwards a to a greater extent than Chinese style, though
2. [+183, -28] Mamamoo's outfits practice human face a fighting similar they're from a Chinese martial arts novel
3. [+136, -8] Well if you lot pattern the hanbok inwards such a Chinese way, you're basically giving the Chinese bait to latch on to... tsk
4. [+94, -15] You can't wearing apparel the hanbok similar this as well as non human face Cathay to larn harder on their claims
5. [+15, -0] China's problematic for claiming the hanbok equally theirs but these outfits are problematic for hanboks too
6. [+15, -1] This pattern makes a mess of the master copy hanbok. Doesn't human face similar hanboks at all. No wonder the Chinese are claiming it equally theirs. Please halt trying to redesign the hanboks inwards this way.
7. [+11, -1] Their outfits human face Chinese fifty-fifty to me... halt amongst such drastic changes. Traditional hanboks practice non run such designs as well as colors
8. [+9, -0] I intend it's neat that they're trying to spread awareness nearly the hanbok but you lot convey to remain inside the boundaries of the hanbok's master copy design. Please pay to a greater extent than attending to the pattern as well as colors side past times side time...
9. [+9, -0] Hanbok or not, these outfits only human face weird as well as ugly ㅋㅋㅋ
10. [+8, -1] Their hanboks human face similar they exclusively used the hanbok stuff as well as came upward amongst a completely novel design. It doesn't convey the feature shape of the hanbok. Changes are fine but inside for sure restrictions. I'm non taking China's side on this but I practice run into where the misunderstandings tin come upward from.
-
No comments for "Mamamoo's Functioning Hanbok Outfits Spark About Other Beginning Controversy"
Post a Comment