Cctv Of Im Seulong's Car Accident Leads To Questions Of Fault

Article: "To tell at that spot is no fault..." Im Seulong's CCTV video creates suspicion

Source: Kukmin Ilbo via Naver

CCTV footage showed manful someone 'A' stepping onto the street to jaywalk earlier he was striking yesteryear Im Seulong's machine ii seconds later. A could move seen discovering the approaching machine as well as running to avoid it, which caused netizens to question, "It's non similar the pedestrian popped out of no where, there's a big endangerment that Im Seulong wasn't watching the road", "the machine looked to move at a high speed, he should've slowed downwards since pedestrians accept priority on the road", acre others defended, "It's difficult to encounter until you're correct upwards against something on rainy days", "The pedestrian's at mistake for non checking the roads on a rainy solar daytime earlier jaywalking".

1. [+8,857, -639] I conduct keep no intention of defending Im Seulong at all. I'm simply a homo inwards my 50s, but I desire to indicate out that it's illegal inwards the get-go house for that pedestrian to move crossing the route on a blood-red light. What could the driver create inwards that situation? If you're actually going to mistake the driver inwards this scenario, y'all involve to overhaul the entire traffic police pull book.

2. [+5,201, -237] The pedestrian should've never crossed at a blood-red lite inwards the get-go place... It's non the driver's mistake inwards this situation. If it is, thence what's the indicate of traffic lights? I've noticed that the elderly create a ton of jaywalking as well as intend of accidents every bit an insurance select handgrip of opportunity. If Im Seulong wasn't drunk, this wasn't his mistake at all.

3. [+2,903, -128] It doesn't affair if he was speeding or non paying attending to the road, the get-go footstep of the mistake lies amongst the jaywalker for doing something illegal, no?? It's unfortunate that he passed away but I experience bad for the driver every bit well.

4. [+1,833, -146] It feels a flake incorrect to blame him for pitiable attending when it was raining heavily...

5. [+1,310, -122] Even if the driver was going slowly, he couldn't conduct keep avoided this. It was dark as well as raining as well as the pedestrian was wearing dark wearing clothing amongst an umbrella acre crossing at a blood-red light. May the deceased residue inwards peace.

6. [+335, -8] Jaywalking acre wearing dark at 11:50 pm on a rainy night, that's insanity

7. [+296, -22] The mistake is amongst the pedestrian. You can't encounter inwards the rain. You tin barely brand out the dividing lines.

8. [+277, -12] There would move no indicate inwards traffic lights if drivers were allowed to move blamed for accidents or deaths caused yesteryear jaywalking. The get-go mistake hither is jaywalking.

-